source-matched, not reviewed
Business and Law Briefs
USEK · Office of the Provost · Course briefs · Business and Law · Draft v0.1

Business and Law Course Briefs

For deans and programme heads: for each course, what the catalogue says today, what MIT Sloan and Harvard Law teach now, which modules to plug in this week, and what to keep, compress and add.

First wave: 6 courses chosen because they sit closest to AI's effect on business and law. Every quote is checked word for word against its saved source, and every module against the module index. Back to the Provost's Frontier View.

This week

Module picks, freshest first

Each pick covers a gap in one course. DeepLearning.AI shows when a course was last updated; Coursera shows when it opened; the list is meant to be reviewed weekly.

How currentModuleFor courseHow to use it
8Evaluating AI AgentsDeepLearning.AIMGT335How prototype teams measure their before-and-after for the host organization.
13Agentic AIDeepLearning.AIMGT335Technical grounding for prototype teams in weeks 1 to 3.
16Generative AI for EveryoneDeepLearning.AIMKT685Pre-work before the content-production unit, so class time goes to rules and quality checks.
73Building and Evaluating Data AgentsDeepLearning.AIFIM655Lab track for the agent unit: students build a data agent, then measure where it goes wrong.
118AI for EveryoneDeepLearning.AIDRG320.1Non-technical grounding in what AI systems can and cannot do, for the liability unit.
118AI for EveryoneDeepLearning.AIICL585Shared vocabulary before the comparative AI governance unit.
118Governing AI AgentsDeepLearning.AIDRG510Background for the board oversight unit: what controls on AI agents look like in practice.
not datedFinancial Market Forecasting with Machine LearningCourseraFIM655Covers LSTM and transformer models side by side: the material for compressing recurrent networks into one session.
not datedMarketing in the Age of AICourseraMKT685Six-week companion track for the content-production and AI-assistant units.
not datedAI for Entrepreneurs and Startups TrainingCourseraMGT335Customer discovery, idea validation and prototyping with AI tools, as pre-work for prototype teams.
not datedAI Fluency: Framework & FoundationsAnthropic, on CourseraDRG320.1Pre-work for the unit on using AI in legal work: effective, ethical and safe use, before the citation audit.
not datedWhy AI Needs Legal Governance: Risk, Liability, & ComplianceCourseraDRG320.1Documented AI failures and the basics of AI governance, as reading before the liability unit.
not datedNavigating AI Regulations: EU, NIST, ISO & FrameworksCourseraICL585Overview of EU, NIST and ISO frameworks for the comparative AI governance unit.
Business

Business: 3 of 155 courses briefed

FIM655 Artificial Intelligence for Finance

Catalogue today
“explore Deep Learning and neural networks, specifically the Recurrent Neural Networks, which will be used later to deal with financial data.”
Closest peer courses say
  • MIT 15.C51 Modeling with Machine Learning: Financial Technology: “Applications include valuation, credit analysis, proprietary trading and hedge-fund strategies, portfolio management, market structure, risk management and stress testing, natural language processing, and personal finance.”
  • MIT 15.458 Financial Data Science and Computing: “Topics include machine learning, natural language processing, predictive analytics, regression methods, and time series analysis.”
  • MIT 15.071 The AI Edge: “neural networks, transformers, large language models, and multi-modal AI”
This week's module picks
Keep
  • Supervised and unsupervised learning on financial data
  • Forecasting and credit rating as the anchor applications
Compress
  • Recurrent neural networks as the main deep learning method → One session, set beside transformers and language models
    MIT's AI subject for managers teaches transformers and large language models; USEK's course names only recurrent networks.
Add
UnitLearning outcomeAssignmentWhy
Financial text as dataStudents pull a signal from earnings calls, filings or news with a language model and test it against a simple baseline.A signal built from one quarter of earnings-call transcripts, scored against next-month returns, with the baseline it must beat.Both MIT finance subjects above list natural language processing; USEK's course does not mention text.
Validating a credit model: stability, bias, explanationStudents validate a credit-scoring model, test it for unfair outcomes across groups, and explain any single decision to a customer.A validation report on a credit model: out-of-time accuracy, a bias test, and three decision explanations written for the applicant.Credit rating is already in the course. Harvard Law teaches detecting and correcting for algorithmic discrimination; the analyst who builds the model is the first line of that check.
AI agents in financial analysis, under human sign-offStudents direct an AI agent through a standard analysis, then find and fix its errors before signing.An agent-drafted company valuation, submitted with the student's error log: every number the agent got wrong and how it was caught.36% of 1,001 technical postings at six frontier labs ask for agents and tool use; graduates will supervise agent output, not only build models.
Forecast versus futures (UNCERTAIN step 5)Students set a point forecast beside alternative scenarios and say which decisions each one supports.A credit-default forecast for a Lebanese loan book, then a 2x2 on two key uncertainties (currency regime, AI use in lending) with a narrative for each quadrant.A forecast gives one number; finance graduates also need to plan across futures the model cannot see. The futures layer of the rubric scores this course at zero today.

AssessmentGrade the validation and the error log, not model accuracy alone. Add one in-class model critique without AI tools.

MKT685 Digital Marketing Strategy

Catalogue today
“Topics such as social media, SEO, Content marketing, mobile technologies and other key digital marketing tools will be explored.”
Closest peer courses say
  • MIT 15.814 Marketing Innovation: “Subject updated continually to highlight the latest use of artificial intelligence for marketing.”
  • MIT 15.570 Digital Marketing and Social Media Analytics: “Stresses the theory and practice of randomized experimentation, AB testing and the importance of causal inference for marketing strategy.”
  • MIT 15.819 Marketing and Product Analytics: “Uses quantitative data to inform, make, and automate marketing and product decisions”
This week's module picks
  • Generative AI for Everyone DeepLearning.AI, updated 16 days ago
    Pre-work before the content-production unit, so class time goes to rules and quality checks.
  • Marketing in the Age of AI Coursera, opened 358 days ago
    Six-week companion track for the content-production and AI-assistant units.
Keep
  • Consumer-centric strategy frameworks
  • Analytics and experimentation, already named in the description
Compress
  • SEO as ranking in classic search results → One part of a wider unit on how customers find a brand
    Customers now also ask AI assistants, which answer instead of listing links; ranking alone no longer covers discovery.
Add
UnitLearning outcomeAssignmentWhy
Experiments that prove what workedStudents design, size and read an A/B test, and say what it does and does not prove.A live A/B test on a real campaign for a USEK unit or a Lebanese small business, with the metric fixed before launch.MIT 15.570 puts randomized experiments and causal inference at the centre; USEK's course names experimentation without teaching the method.
Producing campaigns with generative AI, under rulesStudents produce a campaign with AI tools, record what the AI made, and check every claim before release.A full campaign plus a production log (what was AI-made, what was changed) and a claim check against sources.MIT updates its marketing subject continually for AI; USEK's course does not name AI.
Being chosen by AI assistants and agentsStudents explain how an AI assistant decides what to recommend and audit how a brand appears in its answers.An audit of how three AI assistants describe one Lebanese brand, with fixes and a re-test four weeks later.AI assistants now answer product questions directly; MIT 15.819 already teaches automating marketing decisions.
Signals of how customers will choose (UNCERTAIN steps 4 and 6)Students keep a signal log on how customers find and buy, then trace the second- and third-order effects of one signal.A four-week signal log fed by the platform's daily watch, ending in a futures wheel for: AI agents buy on the customer's behalf.Marketing plans assume today's buying journey; the course has no unit that looks past it.

AssessmentGrade the pre-registered test and its readout, and the audit's before-and-after. Add a short oral defence of one strategic choice.

MGT335 Technology and Innovation Management

Catalogue today
“Three aspects of innovation will be studied: exploration, execution, and exploitation.”
Closest peer courses say
  • MIT 15.358 Strategy in the Age of Digital Platforms: “Topics may include: Generative AI as a new innovation platform and AI/ML ventures more broadly”
  • MIT 15.573 Generative AI for Managers: “enabling students to evaluate opportunities, guide technical teams, and shape AI-driven products from concept to market within startups or established enterprises.”
  • MIT 15.566 Generative AI Lab: “requiring teams to build working end-to-end prototypes on top of LLM APIs rather than focusing on pure theory or research.”
This week's module picks
  • Agentic AI DeepLearning.AI, updated 13 days ago
    Technical grounding for prototype teams in weeks 1 to 3.
  • Evaluating AI Agents DeepLearning.AI, updated 8 days ago
    How prototype teams measure their before-and-after for the host organization.
  • AI for Entrepreneurs and Startups Training Coursera, opened 34 days ago
    Customer discovery, idea validation and prototyping with AI tools, as pre-work for prototype teams.
Keep
  • Exploration, execution and exploitation as the frame
  • Success and failure cases
Compress
  • Nothing to compress.
Add
UnitLearning outcomeAssignmentWhy
AI-native venturesStudents take apart an AI-native venture: what it builds on, its cost per task, what it owns that a model provider could not copy.A teardown of one AI-native company, ending in a one-page view on whether its advantage lasts two years.MIT teaches generative AI as a new innovation platform; USEK's case base is start-ups and established firms in general.
A working prototype for a real clientTeams build and test a working AI prototype for a problem a host organization brings.A prototype built on a model provider's interface, tested on the host's real cases, with a measured before-and-after.MIT's Generative AI Lab requires working end-to-end prototypes rather than theory.
Planning when the technology doubles every few months (UNCERTAIN step 5)Students time a product decision against measured AI progress and write two scenarios for where it leaves the product.A two-scenario memo: the product if AI task length doubles again within a year, and if it stalls.The length of task the best AI model completes alone went from 3.4 to 17.4 hours in 8 months. No USEK course description names foresight.

AssessmentA demo to an outside panel, judged on the measured result for the host, plus the scenario memo. Fewer written exams.

Law & Political Sciences

Law & Political Sciences: 3 of 179 courses briefed

DRG320.1 Computer and Internet Law

Catalogue today
“This course deals with learning the essentials of computer and network technologies, and how those technologies are challenging settled legal understandings.”
Closest peer courses say
  • Harvard Law, Digital Governance: Privacy, Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology: “General topics will cover the philosophy, public policy and regulation of privacy, data protection, international data transfers, AI, behavioral and location tracking, profiling, microtargeting, algorithmic accountability, automated decision-making, and online disinformation.”
  • Harvard Law, Practical Uses for AI in Law: “The primary focus will be on demystifying AI tools and equipping students with the skills to leverage these technologies effectively in their future legal careers.”
This week's module picks
Keep
  • Technology essentials for lawyers
  • Intellectual property and tort as the sources of internet law
Compress
  • Nothing to compress.
Add
UnitLearning outcomeAssignmentWhy
Personal data and automated decisions under Lebanese lawStudents apply Lebanon's Law 81 of 2018 to a case of profiling or automated decision-making, and compare it with the EU approach.A memo advising a Lebanese bank or retailer on one automated decision it makes about customers.Law 81 on electronic transactions and personal data was enacted in 2018; Harvard teaches profiling, automated decision-making and data transfers as core topics.
Using AI in legal work, and checking itStudents research with an AI tool and verify every authority it cites before relying on it.An AI-assisted research memo submitted with a citation audit: each source checked, each error recorded.Harvard runs a whole course on practical AI tools; its Agentic Legal Engineering seminar has students analyze real litigation for AI-generated submissions.
Who answers when AI causes harmStudents allocate liability for harm caused by an AI system among developer, deployer and user, under existing tort and contract law.A problem set of three fact patterns: wrong AI advice, an autonomous vehicle, a discriminatory screening tool.Harvard's reading group covers liability for incorrect or unlawful advice given by generative AI and harms caused by autonomous vehicles.
The legal profession in 2035 (UNCERTAIN step 6)Students map how AI changes what lawyers do, and what that means for their own careers.A futures wheel on: AI agents do most legal research by 2035, with the options it opens for a Lebanese law firm.Harvard teaches how AI is transforming how lawyers create value in a volatile, uncertain world; USEK law students get no unit on it.

AssessmentAdd a closed-book issue-spotting exam on an unseen technology fact pattern, and require an AI-use log on written work.

ICL585 Internet Law

Catalogue today
“The questions addressed may include issues of copyright, trademark, defamation, the Communications Decency Act, cybercrime, contracts, privacy and personal jurisdiction.”
Closest peer courses say
  • Harvard Law, Law and Artificial Intelligence: “comparative AI governance (global and across the states); AI uses by courts and lawyers; and updating existing laws (e.g., anti-discrimination, consumer protection, torts, intellectual property) in light of AI.”
  • Harvard Law, Algorithms, Rights, and Responsibilities: “we will discuss the intellectual property implications of algorithms, models, and their outputs”
  • Harvard Law, Digital Governance: “Comparisons among US, UK, and EU approaches will be addressed.”
This week's module picks
Keep
  • Copyright, trademark, defamation, cybercrime, privacy, jurisdiction
Compress
  • The US Communications Decency Act as a named topic → One case inside a comparative unit on platform liability
    Harvard teaches US, UK and EU approaches side by side; a single US statute is narrow for practice in Lebanon.
Add
UnitLearning outcomeAssignmentWhy
Copyright and AI: training data and outputsStudents advise on whether training a model on protected works, and the model's output, infringe or are protected.An opinion for a Lebanese publisher whose books may have been used to train a model.Harvard covers the intellectual property implications of algorithms, models and their outputs; ICL585 teaches copyright without AI.
Comparative AI governanceStudents compare how the EU, the US and one Arab jurisdiction regulate AI, and map the gaps for Lebanon.A comparison table and a two-page note on what a Lebanese AI rule would need to cover.Harvard's Law and Artificial Intelligence seminar is built on comparative AI governance.
Contracts made by software agentsStudents decide when an agreement concluded by an AI agent binds the person or company behind it.A moot on a contract an AI purchasing agent concluded without human review.Argentina's proposed non-human corporation could sign contracts and hold assets on its own.
Scenarios for internet and AI regulation (UNCERTAIN step 5)Students build alternative futures for how internet and AI law could develop, and test one legal strategy against each.A 2x2 on two uncertainties (strict or light AI rules; fast or slow AI adoption in Lebanon) and a one-page client strategy tested in all four.Internet law changes faster than the syllabus; scenario practice is how a lawyer advises when the rules are not yet written.

AssessmentReplace part of the final exam with the moot and the governance note; keep a closed-book segment on core doctrine.

DRG510 Advanced Corporate Law

Catalogue today
“the rules of powers and responsibilities applicable to each corporate player, legal person and corporate organs.”
Closest peer courses say
  • Harvard Law, Debates on Frontier AI Governance: “This course will explore some of the most fundamental debates in the legal and corporate governance of frontier AI models and systems.”
  • MIT 15.562 Web3 and Strategy: “decentralized finance (DeFi) and organizations (DAOs), smart contracts”
  • Argentina, proposed corporations law (reported): “an entity run by AI agents or robots that can sign contracts and hold assets on its own, with human shareholders optional rather than required.”
This week's module picks
  • Governing AI Agents DeepLearning.AI, updated 118 days ago
    Background for the board oversight unit: what controls on AI agents look like in practice.
Keep
  • Group operations
  • Powers and responsibilities of corporate players and organs
  • The Lebanese and French comparison
Compress
  • Nothing to compress.
Add
UnitLearning outcomeAssignmentWhy
Companies without peopleStudents test whether Lebanese and French company law could recognize a company run by software, and where liability would fall.A memo on Argentina's non-human corporation proposal: could it be registered in Lebanon, who would represent it, who would answer for it.Argentina has proposed exactly this; none of the AI courses read at USEK or Harvard covers AI-run companies.
The board's duty to oversee AIStudents set out what directors must know and decide when the company relies on AI for material decisions.A board AI oversight policy for a listed Lebanese bank, with the reporting the board should receive each quarter.Harvard teaches the corporate governance of frontier AI; MIT teaches AI strategy, governance and ethics to managers.
No-regret governance moves (UNCERTAIN step 7)Students find the governance rules that hold whether software-run companies are recognized, banned or tolerated.Three short scenarios for software-run companies in Lebanon by 2035, then the no-regret moves a board should make today.Argentina's proposal shows the question is live; a board cannot wait for the law to settle.

AssessmentGrade the memo and the policy as practice documents, and keep the comparative exam.

All pages